Commitment to transparent functioning

We at Pardarshita strongly feel that while we demand the government departments to be transparent with everyone, we also have a duty of maintaining transparency in terms of our own work, expenditures, funding and so on. So, to re-iterate our commitment towards ethical and pardarshi work, we invite anyone to inspect our books of accounts.

Friday 30 December 2011

In this government-run school, students chill

Around 1,500 students in a government-run school in north-east area of the city sit on bare ground, instead of benches of classrooms.
Sugandha Pathak, New Delhi, December 28, DHNS:
Open Education

Sarvodaya Kanya Vidayalaya located in New Seemapuri have two school shifts, morning and afternoon. While the morning classes (7am -12.30 pm) cater to girl students, the afternoon shift (1pm-6 pm) is attended by boys. “On some winter days, the fog is so thick that we can't see what the teacher is writing on the blackboard. Sitting on the freezing cold ground makes us sick. We are too scared to complain to the teacher. When the weather becomes unbearable, we are asked to sit inside till the sun comes out. During winters specially, teachers don't teach, they like to sit in the sun. Then there is this constant disturbance due to noise coming from classrooms,” said Mariyam, a standard 7 student of the school.

For the last three to four years, students say, the school has made it mandatory for students from standard 6th to 8th on the ground in the open.

According to NGO, Pardarshita, which is working towards creating awareness about Right To Information (RTI) Act and Right to Education (RTE) Act, the school which has 3,100 students (in the two shifts) have only 28 classes to accommodate them.

“Over 1,000 students in the morning shift and over 1,200 in the afternoon classes sit in the open. Last year, we sent a written complaint to Delhi Commission for Protection Of Child Rights (DCPCR) regarding the poor infrastructure in the school last year, and written complaints from parents and students were sent to DCPCR on July 17, 2010. We also sent a complaint letter to Directorate of Education (DoE), but the situation remains the same. We have requested for tents or sheds to be put up, if not pucca class rooms, but are yet to any response,” said Rajeev Kumar.

Though the city's winters are difficult, the summer season is even worse, with temperature rising to 40-44 degrees Celsius.

“One summer day, my daughter Sabreen came back from school and started vomiting after which she fell unconscious. Later, she told us that she and many students sit in the open and that there were quite a few cases of children fainting and falling terribly sick,” said Mohammad Naim, a labourer. His two daughters, Sabreen and Aasmeen study in the school. Sabreen is now in Class 7. She has attended classes in the open since Class 6.

The students also said that there are few classes that are locked as they serve as store rooms for the school.

“These locked rooms have lots of garbage, broken desks etc. We have asked teachers to open these rooms. We even volunteered to clean the rooms. But the teachers refuse to listen. In summers, we try to sit under the shade of trees on the ground, but it gets difficult during rain. The students are allowed to take shelter inside the class rooms for some time. With such to and fro, when do we study?” asks Sajid, who attends the afternoon shift. He is now in Class 10 and has spent considerable amount of time sitting in the open.

A few students tried to talk to the principal, but he had no answers. “The principal said I know you people sit out in the open, but nothing can be done right now about it,” said Kajal, a Class 11 student.

Saturday 24 December 2011

Delhi schools default on providing information on poor quota

ABHIMANYU SINGH  NEW DELHI | 18th Dec 2011
number of Delhi-based government-aided private schools, including Sanskriti, Delhi Police Public School and Jindal International School, have not provided any information to the Delhi government about the number of children they have admitted under the Economically Weaker Sections quota in the current year. Or they have provided the information considerably late.

Delhi government's Department of Education is mandated to maintain a list of all government aided private schools, along with data on the fulfilment of the EWS quota, on its website, as per a notification issued by the Delhi government. The Right to Education Act stipulates that all government aided private schools should admit 25% children under the EWS quota every year at the entry level.

In the case of Sanskriti, which is run by the wives of Central civil servants, the DoE released the list of children admitted under the EWS quota after a gap of almost six months. The last date for schools to provide the information was 30 July. This development comes after the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and the Central Information Commission intervened in the matter.
Following a complaint by a city-based RTE activist, Ritu Mehra, the Central Information Commission took note that the schools had not provided the information despite the Delhi government directive ordering the Directorate of Education to collect and publish the data. The schools contested the CIC's order in the Delhi High Court. The court upheld the CIC's order.

In spite of this, Sanskriti did not provide the required information. So the NCPCR had to intervene and ask the school to comply with the order.

A source in the principal's office at Sanskriti said, "We had sent the information to the Directorate of Education. However, complete information could not be sent because of a technical error on our side about which we were not aware. After we got the Commission's letter, we sent the full information again."

The authorities of the Delhi Police Public School and Jindal International School could not be contacted despite several attempts.
RTE activist Ritu Mehra said that she was surprised that many of the children admitted in Sanskriti under the EWS quota came from far-off places. The school is situated in Chankyapuri. "Under the EWS quota it has admitted students who live in Gurgaon, Patel Nagar, IP Extension, Janakpuri and Palam Vihar. It will cost these students at least Rs 1,500 a month on conveyance. I wonder how they can come under the EWS quota," said Mehra.

Some schools contested that they could not fulfil the quota for the current year because of lack of students.

Raj Kamal, the head of administration at Green Valley International School, said that they were not approached by anyone seeking admission under the quota: "We are ready to give admission under the EWS quota. But we received no applications in this regard. How can we admit children in such a circumstance?"

Some other schools claimed that they had sent the data to the Department of Education, but the latter failed to upload the same on its website. Parvati Ramachandran, the head of administration at Florence Public School, said, "We have fulfilled our quota and sent the list to DoE."

Mehra said that the schools employ delaying tactics in order to hide the fact that they have not fulfilled the quota. "It is easy to say that they have fulfilled the quota when they might not have done so. They also wilfully delay sending the information so that it is not uploaded on time," said Mehra.

MCD schools flout RTE norms

Some classrooms have more than 100 children, only one teacher

Jasleen Kaur | New Delhi | December 21 2011
 
The schools of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) are not adhering to the norms of the Right to Education Act (RTE) Act. Information gathered through RTI queries reveals that many of these schools do not meet the prescribed pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) norms mandated by the law and there is more than one class being conducted from the same room.

In MCD School New Seema Puri 1, four sections of class nursery with more than 130 children sit in the same room, room number six, with just two teachers. And the other two sections of the same class with total 70 children sit in class room number five with just one teacher. Not just there are more children in a single classroom but there are also fewer teachers. As the RTE Act says that in a primary school, for 200 children there should be at least five teachers.

Similarly, in MCD School New Seema Puri 2,120 children of two sections of class two sit in the same room with a single teacher. And two sections of class four with total 120 children sit in the same room with just one teacher. This problem is common in most of the MCD schools in the district.

Rajiv Kumar from Pardarshita, which filed the RTI, says that MCD has claimed that it has maintained the PTR in its schools. “We filed the RTI for 25 MCD schools but we got information for 20. The data is surprising. We can just imagine how so many children must be studying in a single classroom with just one teacher,” he adds.

In some other schools, where children of one section sit in one room, the average strength is more than what is prescribed in the law. The average strength in five sections of class five of MCD School Nand Nagri 0-1 is 46, whereas in Nandnagri 0-2, the average strength in class five is 54 and in class three it is 63.

The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, which was implemented in 2010, stipulates a variety of norms that all schools must adhere to. One of the most important aspects is the pupil-teacher ratio (PTR). The law prescribes a PTR of 30 or less for schools with less than 200 enrolled students and 40 for schools with greater enrollment.

Thursday 22 December 2011

Recruitment

Pardarshita has been working with poor and marginalized people in Delhi since 2005, and reaching out to thousands of people. We are working with women, children and urban poor to collectively address poverty, quality education and injustice.
Pardarshita is looking for motivated and enthusiastic people to join our fundraising team as Fundraisers in Delhi and surrounding areas.
As a fundraiser, you will be connecting and enthusing larger masses for partnering our projects through child sponsorship. We are looking for fearless and optimistic communicators who work well in team.  
Key Responsibilities-:
  • To communicate effectively and involve large masses in the activities of the organisation 
  • To participate in all the sponsor campaigns, fundraising, public engagement and other Pardarshita activities
  • To identify potential locations for organising fundraising campaigns
  • To generate funds through face-to-face fundraising techniques 
  • To achieve agreed targets for sponsor/donor acquisition
  • To ensure confidentiality of information pertaining to Pardarshita
Desired Profile
  • Should be a Graduate in any stream. Preferably with understanding and experience of individual / direct fund raising/ marketing through direct dialogue.
  • Should have willingness to travel extensively across the given locations
  • Should have a strong interest and commitment to work on the issues of the poor and Should share Pardarshita’s values
  • Should be fluent in English and any local language
  • Should have the ability to execute duties with an inspired and motivated attitude
Salary and Benefits:
  • The incumbent will be on Pardarshita's pay-roll.
  • Salary: Rs. 12,000 per month. Besides, staff will be covered under medical insurance, personal accident insurance and PF.
  • Field allowance of Rs 100 per day.
  • Encouraging work culture and prospects of good career growth within Pardarshita
If you are interested in this position, please forward your updated CV to pardarshita.recruitment@yahoo.com. If short-listed, we will contact you.

Friday 4 November 2011

NCPCR sends notice to Sanskriti School on Pardarshita's complaint (frwded message from NCPCR)



--- On Tue, 25/10/11, RTE Division NCPCR <rtedivisionncpcr@gmail.com> wrote:


From: RTE Division NCPCR <rtedivisionncpcr@gmail.com>
Subject: Sanskriti School makes a joke of high court orders and Directorate of Education by not publishing the information pertaining to admission given under EWS quota on the school website
To: pardarshita_india@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, 25 October, 2011, 11:40 AM


 
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS
5th FLOOR, Chanderlok Buidling, Janpath, New Dehi - 110 001
Phone : 011 23724027/28/29, Fax No. : 011 23724026/23731584
Website : www.ncpcr.gov.in, Email : complaints.ncpcr@gmail.com

F.No: DL-1206/27387/2010-11/RTE

Date: 24/10/2011

To,      Smt. Abha Sahgal
      The Principal
      Sanskriti School
      Dr. S.Radhakrishnan Marg
      Chanakyapuri - 21
      Delhi

Subject: Sanskriti School makes a joke of high court orders and Directorate of Education by not publishing the information pertaining to admission given under EWS quota on the school website

Sir/Madam,
        I am directed to say that the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has been constituted under the provisions of the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights (CPCR) Act, 2005 for protection of child rights and other related matters. One of the functions assigned to the Commission under Section 13 (1)(j) of CPCR Act is to inquire into complaints and suo motu cognizance in relation to deprivation and violation of child rights.

2.        The Commission has received a complaint (a copy of the complaint is enclosed) dated 08/10/2011 from Ritu Mehra . The gist of the complaint / allegation is as under:

"Sanskriti School makes a joke of high court orders and Directorate of Education by not publishing the information pertaining to admission given under EWS quota on the school website. The complaint is self explanatory which may kindly be perused."

3.        After perusing the complaint, the Commission has taken cognizance of the matter and directed that the matter be referred to you for investigation/inquiry and report to the Commission.

4.        You are accordingly requested to get the matter investigated and take further necessary action. A factual report, along with authenticated copies of the relevant documents, be sent to the Commission within 15 days of issue of this letter. The Report should indicate inter-alia the information on the following points :

  1. Kindly look into the matter on priority basis and follow the provisions of the RTE Act 2009 according to which for the purpose of this Act, a school, (c) Specified in sub- clause (iii) and (iv) of clause (n) of section 2 shall admit in class I, to the extent of at least twenty-five per cent. Of the strength of that class, children belonging to weaker section and disadvantaged group in the neighborhood and provide free and compulsory elementary education till its completion.
     
  2. List of children who gets admitted under EWS quota should be made public through website

5.        In case, any other Commission duly constituted under any law, has also taken up this matter with you or any other authority, a copy of their communication may also be furnished.

6.        Please quote the number and date of this letter mentioned at the top while responding.


Encl: As above


Yours faithfully,


Sd/-      
 (Lov Verma)
Member Secretary


Monday, 10 October 2011


Sanskriti School makes a joke of High Court Orders & Directorate of Education

Dear Friend,
 
Greetings!
 
According to the Right to Education Act 2009 Delhi Government has issued a notification regarding the admission of children belonging to Economically Weaker Section quota and as per this order: “schools shall furnish information regarding admissions under this quota on the official website of Directorate of Education”. Months have passed but schools have not published the information regarding admission list on the website.
 
As this matter is related to information disclosure and transparency therefore we have filed complaint with Central Information Commission (CIC) stating that neither the Directorate of Education nor the Private Schools have displayed the list of children admitted under EWS quota on their respective websites. 
 
Considering facts of the complaint, CIC directed the Director to ensure that the information related to admissions done under EWS quota should be displayed on website. The commission further ordered that the Annual Returns filed by Private schools would also be uploaded on website of the Department of Education CIC/SG/C/2009/001627/6018.
 
After this, a lobby of Public Schools approached to Delhi High Court against the order of CIC. In view of the facts the Hon’ble High Court also ordered to display the information concerning to the admissions under EWS quota and stayed on disclosure of information related to Annual Returns of School on the website of Directorate of Education (DOE) till the next date of hearing [WP (Civil) 21/2011].
 
Following the order of Hon’ble High Court most of the schools have displayed the list of admission done under EWS quota on the website of DOE, but Sanskriti School, an eminent school of Delhi, has uploaded nonsensical information. The information displayed is as follows:
 
Name of the School
SANSKRITI SCHOOL
School Code 2026118
Zone 26
District New Delhi


 
Name of children admitted in Free-ship Category of session (2011-12) for class I
Sr No      Name     Name        Residence  Category
              of Child   of Father     Address
1         dfdfdjhj          hjh                  jhj          Free-ship
 
The link for this information is:
 
http://edustud.nic.in/mis/student/frmchildrenadmittedinFreeshipReportPublictLevel.aspx
 
While most of the Private Schools have uploaded EWS list on the website but the information uploaded by Sanskriti School is not only an eyewash and a violation of the High Court order, it is makes a joke of government's education department.
 
Under such circumstances only one statement can be true: Whether Sanskriti School supersedes DOE or DOE has no control over Sanskriti School.
 
Warmly,
Ritu Mehra
Pardarshita

Wednesday 26 October 2011

Monday 10 October 2011

Sanskriti School makes a joke of High Court Orders & Directorate of Education

Dear Friend,
 
Greetings!
 
According to the Right to Education Act 2009 Delhi Government has issued a notification regarding the admission of children belonging to Economically Weaker Section quota and as per this order: “schools shall furnish information regarding admissions under this quota on the official website of Directorate of Education”. Months have passed but schools have not published the information regarding admission list on the website.
 
As this matter is related to information disclosure and transparency therefore we have filed complaint with Central Information Commission (CIC) stating that neither the Directorate of Education nor the Private Schools have displayed the list of children admitted under EWS quota on their respective websites. 
 
Considering facts of the complaint, CIC directed the Director to ensure that the information related to admissions done under EWS quota should be displayed on website. The commission further ordered that the Annual Returns filed by Private schools would also be uploaded on website of the Department of Education CIC/SG/C/2009/001627/6018.
 
After this, a lobby of Public Schools approached to Delhi High Court against the order of CIC. In view of the facts the Hon’ble High Court also ordered to display the information concerning to the admissions under EWS quota and stayed on disclosure of information related to Annual Returns of School on the website of Directorate of Education (DOE) till the next date of hearing [WP (Civil) 21/2011].
 
Following the order of Hon’ble High Court most of the schools have displayed the list of admission done under EWS quota on the website of DOE, but Sanskriti School, an eminent school of Delhi, has uploaded nonsensical information. The information displayed is as follows:
 
Name of the School
SANSKRITI SCHOOL
School Code 2026118
Zone 26
District New Delhi

 
Name of children admitted in Free-ship Category of session (2011-12) for class I
Sr No      Name     Name        Residence  Category
              of Child   of Father     Address
1         dfdfdjhj          hjh                  jhj          Free-ship
 
The link for this information is:
 
http://edustud.nic.in/mis/student/frmchildrenadmittedinFreeshipReportPublictLevel.aspx
 
While most of the Private Schools have uploaded EWS list on the website but the information uploaded by Sanskriti School is not only an eyewash and a violation of the High Court order, it is makes a joke of government's education department.
 
Under such circumstances only one statement can be true: Whether Sanskriti School supersedes DOE or DOE has no control over Sanskriti School.
 
Warmly,
Ritu Mehra
Pardarshita

Tuesday 20 September 2011

Include pension under e-SLA, say NGOs


Buoyed by the latest government decision promising time-bound delivery of services under the e-Service Level Agreement (e-SLA), NGOs working for senior citizens have demanded that ‘old age pension’ be included under its ambit. “Hundreds of Delhi’s destitute and poor older persons, eligible for old age pension and other social assistance services, cannot avail these due to non-availability of specific instructions to authorities concerned and non-cooperation from government departments,” said Himanshu Rath of NGO Agewell India.


Many older persons who have finally succeeded in filing their applications have no idea about the status of their applications for old age pension. “So we appeal to the Delhi government to include the process of old age pension under the e-SLA project,” he said.

“There are other problems too which need to be brought under e-SLA,” said Ritu Mehra, from NGO Pardarshita. “Several times, it has come to our notice that a person stops getting pension after two consecutive years of receiving it. The e-SLA scheme can bring in accountability for all such problems,” Mehra added.

Tuesday 16 August 2011

How a 'rich' school tagged poor students in Delhi

IANS Aug 14, 2011, 05.53pm IST

NEW DELHI: St. Andrews Scots Senior Secondary School, a posh school in east Delhi, boasts of "providing value-based education" to its students but is under the scanner of a child rights panel - for tagging poor students.

The school admits poor students under the legally bound 10 percent freeship quota - fee waiver - for economically disadvantaged children.

But the students, their parents and child rights activists allege that the school discriminates against poor kids, profiles them on the basis of their socio-economic status and makes them wear tags showing they have been admitted under the quota.

The children are made to wear an ink mark "F/S", denoting freeship, on their shirt collars to distinguish them from the rest of the children.

Parents of some of the poor students approached NGO Pardarshita that helped in filing a complaint with the Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR). As soon as the rights panel started probing the matter in May and issued notice to the school, the tagging system was immediately done away with.

"We issued notice to the school after we received a complaint that the EWS (economically weaker section) students were discriminated by teachers. The school has given its explanations which were unconvincing," DCPCR chairman Amod Kanth said. "The matter is under probe. The categorizing of students is illegal," said Kanth.

Officials of Pardarshita allege that some of the students were even segregated and kept in a separate room during school hours.

Ritu Mehra of Pardarshita said her organization came to know about the discriminatory treatment after three of the children and their parents came forward and sought help.
The three children stay in the Indira Camp in east Delhi.

She said all the children from Class 1 to 5 admitted under the quota were forced to sit on the floor and not even allowed to use the school toilets.

Suman, a resident of Indira Camp in east Delhi, has her daughter in preparatory class of the school. She has a more shocking story to share.

"My daughter was not allowed to interact with other kids for around one and a half months because they thought she stinks. The school tagged her 'F/S' on her uniform," Suman said.
She said that her daughter was even bribed by school authorities to lie before the rights panel if its officials come for inspection. "They gave chocolates to kids to lure them and promised a picnic if they don't complain and lie before the investigating officers," said Suman.

Tuesday 2 August 2011

Dear friends,

It is of great pleasure to share with you all that our team member Ms. Ritu Mehra has been honoured with Sri Ram Anugrah Narayan Smriti Nari Sashaktikaran Award by Navratan Jan Kalyan Society on 14th May, 2011.

She has been honoured for her great efforts in empowering women of marginalised sections of the community and for getting hundreds of children of economically weaker sections admitted in private schools of Delhi.

Pardarshita

F-185,186 New Seema Puri

Delhi-110095
Ph: 01122356476,9899358835


Friday 27 May 2011

HELPLESS CHILD, DISABLED CHILD HELPLINE (update about rescue)

Dear All,

I had a conversation with Varun from Childline last night and i must tell you that he is working hard on this case. Think i was cutting into his dinner time as he spoke to me about the event of rescue in detail! It's a more complicated situation now because the abusive contractors are using pressure tactics to get out of the legal mess they have landed themselves in.

Varun's team had gone back to the same slaughter house yesterday, all prepared with about 35 people- three gypsies with the SDM, SHO and ACP in each, one police truck with police force- and rescued more trapped children as was suggested by the runaway kids day before yesterday, when they had approached Pardarshita for help for the first time, who in turn contacted Childline.

What really struck me was the level of danger the rescuers faced themselves, and the level of motivation they had to rescue child labourers at any cost. They were faced with about a dozen guards armed with pistols in the premises of the two contractors, Ali and Maneer, both with ample money and muscle power, as was also visible (in total there were about 400-500 people inside). Despite seeing the police force approaching, the factory guards continued shutting down/blocking entrance to the 'workshop'.

In the midst of all the verbal threatening and high-pitch exchange between the guards and police officials did the doors open, but by then, many children were made to escape simultaneously from the back door (from hall 3 and 4) when finally, about 11 children could be rescued from hall one and two, along with 6 adult men.

Monnat, the 12-year-old boy whose photos of injured body were heart rendering, was one of the few boys who were tortured for running away once before. They were being tortured so that they don't run away again. Glad they did!
My regards and wishes to all the people who care about children and try to do their work with sincerity. And, constructive criticism never harmed anyone either :) (in the context of chain mails below).

Shaweta.
************************************************************************
25/05/11:
Monnat, a 12-year-old child, along with two other minor boys worked as bonded laborers in a slaughter house at Gazi Pur under contractors Siddiqui Ali and Maneer. Ali and Maneer used to beat them brutally, give electric shocks especially to Monnat and keep him locked in a room.

These boys escaped from the clutches of the contractors on 25th May, 2011 and approached people in New Seema Puri, who in turn approached us at Pardarshita office. We promptly dialed Childline helpline number 1098 and after some time, received a call back from 011-22577917. The person on the other side enquired about the runaway children, asking us to reach his office at Tahirpur, Delhi, immediately.

We informed him that one of the boys was very serious as he couldn’t even move, so travelling to Tahirpur was not possible. We were then advised to call the police as they would ‘automatically hand over the boys’ to them. When we asked the name of the person who called us, he refused to identify himself.

As suggested, we dialed 100 number and within half an hour, a PCR van was at our office doorstep. After some time, two constables and one sub-inspector from Seema Puri Police station arrived and, without any logical correlation, gave us an hour-long lecture regarding law, before leaving us a little surprised because that’s not what was expected out of them when everyone was desperately trying to help the children. Anyway, we re-dialed 100 number as Monnat’s condition was continuously deteriorating.

As we also knew Mr. Varun, the coordinator of Childline helpline, we called him on his personal mobile phone and narrated the matter. He promised to send some representatives on the spot asap. After some time, two people from Childline did come, but till then, the police had already taken the injured boys to a hospital in their PCR van.

Monnat belongs to village Guttipada, district Dhupuri, Assam. Out of total four escaped children, the oldest, a 16-year-old, informed us that there are more than ten minor boys also working as bonded laborers with the same contractors.


At the end of the day, we would like to thank Mr Varun because he sent someone from Childline helpline. But we are left thinking about the common man, who does not know him personally and trusts the big, attractive hoardings that claim from rooftops that Childline helpline works for the welfare of children, 24x7, because many times (at least ten times), there has been no appropriate response from them.

Therefore we humbly submit to the helpline in question that reputation does not get built only by distributing promising pamphlets or displaying big hoardings by the road side. What is actually needed is diligent functioning on ground, that too, consistently.

Ritu, Rajiv
Pardarshita

**************************************************************************
Response by Childline; 26/05/11

Dear Mr. Rajiv
We appreciate your concern towards children and case refferals to CHILDLINE 1098. I would not like to comment on the sequence of event at this point of time but would get back to you at the earliest. It definitely looks like there has been some miscommunication/ issues in understanding. I was not able to have a detailed communication with the team members as they were involved in the intervention.

The child is with CHILDLINE and even now while i am writing this mail the team is in the hospital attending to the health needs of the child. It would then take forward the process of filing of the First Information Report and also reporting the caseto the child welfare committee.

Just to share CHILDLINE in Delhi directly intervenes in more than 250 cases in a month . It would be irresponsible on your part to write judgemental statements about the service without knowing the actual functioning and efforts made by teams in case intervention. As an organization we have inbuilt processes to identify issues and handle complaints In the last mail written by Ms Ritu from your organization on the BAA network, I had clearly requested her to report if there js a problem. We at CHILDLINE India Foundation have never received any formal complaint from your end though you claim that the service has not been responsive atleast 10 times. I feel if there is an issue of dysfunctionality atleast you report to appropriate personnel rather than opinion building on a group email.

We do not boast of our achievements and niether do we publicize them. All stakeholders in contact do understand the same.

We are taking cognizance of your email and would definitely get back to you about the case.

Thanks
Komal
CHILDLINE India Foundation.
Mobile - 9899998023
**********************************************************************************
Response by Pardarshita; 26/05/11

Dear Komal,
Greetings!

It is not a statement we made against your helpline in particular. Neither are we competing in this field with you nor we work on this particular issue specifically. But as a common person, whenever we come across such problems, we are unable to resist from helping children in need. With that intention we call your helpline number, with a hope that the children will get support but the attitude of the helpline assistant always disappoints us.

A few months back, we happened to rescue a child from Karkardooma court, called 100 number and also the helpline but no FIR was recorded despite our written statement and photographs to DCP, East. We don't even know what happened to that rescued child subsequently.

We hope and expect that an ordinary person should be able to get full support from a helpline number, without having to call anyone personally, Mr. Varun in this case.

Regards,
Rajiv.

Thursday 26 May 2011

HELPLESS CHILD, DISABLED CHILD HELPLINE; 25/05/11

Monnat, a 12-year-old child, along with two other minor boys worked as bonded laborers in a slaughter house at Gazi Pur under contractors Siddiqui Ali and Maneer. Ali and Maneer used to beat them brutally, give electric shocks especially to Monnat and keep him locked in a room.

These boys escaped from the clutches of the contractors on 25th May, 2011 and approached people in New Seema Puri, who in turn approached us at Pardarshita office. We promptly dialed Childline helpline number 1098 and after some time, received a call back from 011-22577917. The person on the other side enquired about the runaway children, asking us to reach his office at Tahirpur, Delhi, immediately.

We informed him that one of the boys was very serious as he couldn’t even move, so travelling to Tahirpur was not possible. We were then advised to call the police as they would ‘automatically hand over the boys’ to them. When we asked the name of the person who called us, he refused to identify himself.

As suggested, we dialed 100 number and within half an hour, a PCR van was at our office doorstep. After some time, two constables and one sub-inspector from Seema Puri Police station arrived and, without any logical correlation, gave us an hour-long lecture regarding law, before leaving us a little surprised because that’s not what was expected out of them when everyone was desperately trying to help the children. Anyway, we re-dialed 100 number as Monnat’s condition was continuously deteriorating.

As we also knew Mr. Varun, the coordinator of Childline helpline, we called him on his personal mobile phone and narrated the matter. He promised to send some representatives on the spot asap. After some time, two people from Childline did come, but till then, the police had already taken the injured boys to a hospital in their PCR van.

Monnat belongs to village Guttipada, district Dhupuri, Assam. Out of total four escaped children, the oldest, a 16-year-old, informed us that there are more than ten minor boys also working as bonded laborers with the same contractors.

At the end of the day, we would like to thank Mr Varun because he sent someone from Childline helpline. But we are left thinking about the common man, who does not know him personally and trusts the big, attractive hoardings that claim from rooftops that Childline helpline works for the welfare of children, 24x7, because many times (at least ten times), there has been no appropriate response from them.

Therefore we humbly submit to the helpline in question that reputation does not get built only by distributing promising pamphlets or displaying big hoardings by the road side. What is actually needed is diligent functioning on ground, that too, consistently.

Ritu, Rajiv
Pardarshita

Response by Childline; 26/05/11
Dear Mr. Rajiv
We appreciate your concern towards children and case refferals to CHILDLINE 1098. I would not like to comment on the sequence of event at this point of time but would get back to you at the earliest. It definitely looks like there has been some miscommunication/ issues in understanding. I was not able to have a detailed communication with the team members as they were involved in the intervention.

The child is with CHILDLINE and even now while i am writing this mail the team is in the hospital attending to the health needs of the child. It would then take forward the process of filing of the First Information Report and also reporting the caseto the child welfare committee.

Just to share CHILDLINE in Delhi directly intervenes in more than 250 cases in a month . It would be irresponsible on your part to write judgemental statements about the service without knowing the actual functioning and efforts made by teams in case intervention. As an organization we have inbuilt processes to identify issues and handle complaints In the last mail written by Ms Ritu from your organization on the BAA network, I had clearly requested her to report if there js a problem. We at CHILDLINE India Foundation have never received any formal complaint from your end though you claim that the service has not been responsive atleast 10 times. I feel if there is an issue of dysfunctionality atleast you report to appropriate personnel rather than opinion building on a group email.

We do not boast of our achievements and niether do we publicize them. All stakeholders in contact do understand the same.

We are taking cognizance of your email and would definitely get back to you about the case.

Thanks
Komal
CHILDLINE India Foundation.
Mobile - 9899998023

Response by Pardarshita; 26/05/11
Dear Komal,
Greetings!
It is not a statement we made against your helpline in particular. Neither are we competing in this field with you nor we work on this particular issue specifically. But as a common person, whenever we come across such problems, we are unable to resist from helping children in need. With that intention we call your helpline number, with a hope that the children will get support but the attitude of the helpline assistant always disappoints us.

A few months back, we happened to rescue a child from Karkardooma court, called 100 number and also the helpline but no FIR was recorded despite our written statement and photographs to DCP, East. We don't even know what happened to that rescued child subsequently.

We hope and expect that an ordinary person should be able to get full support from a helpline number, without having to call anyone personally, Mr. Varun in this case.

Regards,
Rajiv

Saturday 21 May 2011

'Rs 1,000 instead of grain terrible idea'- HT report

HT Correspondents
New Delhi, May 19, 2011

A number of NGOs have opposed the Delhi government's proposal of giving Rs 1,000 cash per family per month instead of subsidised foodgrains under the Public Distribution System (PDS). A pilot project for approximately 100 families is being run in Raghubir Nagar in west Delhi wherein instead of the subsidised grain, the government is doling out Rs 1,000 in cash.

NGOs working with poor people, however, are aghast at the idea. Ritu Mehra of Pardarshita, said, "The very concept is wrong. Rs 1,000 can hardly fetch the poor the quantity of grain they need from the open market today. Add inflation, and what would you get four years later?"

Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit had convened a meeting with representatives of several NGOs on Wednesday, wherein she reportedly said the step was being taken at the behest of Planning Commission.

Parivartan’s Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday said, "PDS can make a difference in the life of poor people. PDS is critical for country's food economy. It directly affects food procurement and, in turn stabilises food prices."

Santosh Koli from NGO Parivartan narrated how when her team visited the Raghubir Nagar area on May 5, they were stopped by the authorities.

Kejriwal and Koli, in a press conference on Thursday, alleged, "Dikshit is hell bent on the implementation of cash in lieu of subsidy. She has also threatened to arrest anybody who intervened in the government procedure."

The chief minister, in turn, thought it was too premature to pass a judgement on the exercise. "It is just a pilot project—it is experimental," Dikshit told HT. She, however, refused to comment on any of Parivartan's allegations.

Haroon Yusuf, Delhi's food and supplies minister, only said, "This is a pilot project by United Nations Development Programme."

The NGOs have now formed a 'Ration Vyavastha Sudhar Abhiyan' front and have been stressing on the need to carry out a detailed survey to know what the people want and a detailed debate on the issue.

Monday 24 January 2011

Ritu Mehra wins Citizen Journalist award

Dear Friends

It is a great pleasure in sharing the news about our latest achievement as a team. Our team member Ritu Mehra has been honoured with Citizen Journalist Award for reporting a story using a picture to communicate the issue. The picture shows students of a government school, asking residents and passersby to give them water. The school has no drinking water, literally leaving the students and teachers high and dry.

The award adheres to a 2-tier selection process involving The IBN18 Editorial Board that generates a list of nominees across various categories & The Jury comprising Eminent Citizens who select the final Citizen Journalist Award winners. It is an excellent platform to pay a tribute to civil heroes of the society who reported fearlessly and dared to raise their voice against injustice and all odds of society for a better tomorrow.

Best Regards

Rajiv Kumar
Pardarshita

Monday 3 January 2011

Police sub inspector robs a rag picker

Dear friends,
This is to bring to your notice a horrible incident that happened with Ibrahim, resident of E-44/273, New Seema Puri, New Delhi – 95, few days before New Year’s eve. 
Ibrahim is a rag-picker, who has been honestly doing his work at a garbage bin (Dhallav) situated at Shahdara (in front of Muskaan  Restaurant) for almost 15 years now, earning a dignified livelihood for himself and his family, without ever troubling anyone.
At middle of the night on 27.12.2010, 1:45am precisely, Sub Inspector (SI) Shishpal along with six policemen barged into his modest dwelling and like criminals, looted Rs 37,000 cash the man had painstakingly saved for his daughter’s wedding. The policemen also used abusive language while slapping him on his face in front of his wife and children. The harassment didn't end here as they dragged Ibrahim to Seema Puri Police Station after robbing him first at midnight.
As if this wasn't enough to disgrace khaki vardi, policemen even asked few thieves already in lock up to identify Ibrahim  as their accomplice in unlawful activities, but none of them identified  the rag picker as one of them.
After not being able to charge Ibrahim with any illegal activity at the thana, SI Shishpal ordered him to go back home. Before leaving,  when the hassled man demanded that his money be returned, he was hung upside down, and beaten severely on his lower body parts with sticks. This is police treatment meted out to hardened criminals while here is an innocent man getting subjected to inhuman, shock treatment, who was shaken out of his sleep, robbed of his life’s savings, abused physically and verbally in front of family members for no fault of his.
Next day i.e. on 28.12.2010, Ibrahim submitted a written complaint to Deputy Police Commissioner District North East Delhi, but no action against SI Shishpal was taken. On the contrary, the SI and other policemen are currently threatening strict action against Ibrahim if he didn’t withdraw his complaint.
It is such incidents that make our Nation kneel down in shame, and embarassment, where  a poor person from the minority Muslim community is targetted for extortion and loot by police, and never any rich or powerful personality, who has the resources to put everyone in their places in case of  slight trouble they might have to go through. Such crimes by police are regularly happening in Seema Puri as the majority population  here  comprises poor Muslims. It's a matter of utter shame that the level of discrimination against the weaker and vulnerable sections in our society is so high that even police has stood up against them, looting them and torturing them instead of protecting their interests as per their mandate. 
We are circulating this mail to you for seeking your suggestions because there are very few persons like Ibrahim who raise their voice against such  unlawful acts by police.  
We, at Pardarshita, believe we must help Ibrahim in his fight against a corrupt system.
Zindabad!
Rajiv Kumar

HEAVY PENALTY PAID BY BPL CARD HOLDERS DUE TO MODERNISATION OF FOOD & SUPPLY DEPARTMENT

Dear friends,
This is very unfortunate that on the one hand  food grains are rotting in godowns while on other, thousands of people who have BPL and Antodaya ration cards are not getting ration.
The Assistant Commissioner of North East District has stated before the Central Information Commission:  “because of an error in their computer program, thousands of BPL persons, who are eligible for getting ration, have been denied ration supplies.”  As a result of departmental fault ,people are not getting ration for last five months despite their ration cards.
Since August 2010, the ration supply for thousands of BPL& Antodaya card holders at 70 Circles of Delhi has stopped suddenly. On inquiry, the people affected were told the following at their respective Circle Offices: "the Head Quarter has cancelled the cards; we do not know the reason for the same.” 
The Food & Supply Department had not sent any notice for the cancellation of cards and all of a sudden, when people went to withdraw ration from the FPS shop they were told that their cards are cancelled.
In Seema Puri Constituency, 707 BPL & Antodaya cards were cancelled and when some of the card holders sought reasons for cancellation of their cards under the RTI Act, then the Public Information officer did not provide  any explanation for their cancellation. 
When the matter reached CIC,  at the time of hearing, the PIO gave the list of cancelled 707 BPL & Antodaya Ration Card Holders and informed the Commission that due to the technical fault of computer the BPL & Antodaya Cards throughout Delhi has been cancelled.
The Hon’ble Commissioner directed the PIO to provide compensation of Rs.2000 to the information seekers for not providing the information in set time limit. The Commission also directed the Food Commissioner to provide reasons why the ration has not been provided to the appellants. 
Warm Regards
Rajiv Kumar

Pardarshita

F-185,186 New Seema Puri
Delhi-110095

Ph: 01122356476, 9899358835
Blog:http://pardarshita.blogspot.com
Email: pardarshita_india@yahoo.com